ARTICLE

AN ANALYSIS OF THE JUDICIAL ENFORCEMENT OF SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC RIGHTS

13 Pages : 132-141

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/ger.2017(II-I).13      10.31703/ger.2017(II-I).13      Published : Dec 2017

An Analysis of the Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights

    The modern concept of human rights can be traced back to the European Renaissance. However, it was only after the foundation of the United Nations Organization that practical steps toward global recognition and enforcement could become possible. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) is a unique document in the sense that never before in the history of mankind, nations did agree on universal human rights standards. As it was a declaration and non-binding in nature, it was succeeded by two conventions namely, the International Convention on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Convention on Social Economic and Cultural Rights (ICSER), each comprising of a separate set of human rights. On the other hand, their champion sargue that civil and political rights are a wasteful luxury for an empty belly.

    Constitutional Law, Socio-Economic Rights, International Covenant on Social Economic and Cultural Rights, Judicial Enforcement of Socio- economic Rights
    (1) Naghma Farid
    Nawab Allah Nawaz Khan Law College, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, KP, Pakistan.
    (2) Muhammad Siraj Khan
    Nawab Allah Nawaz Khan Law College, Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, KP, Pakistan.
    (3) Kashif Saleem
    Department of Management Sciences, Qurtuba University, Dera Ismail Khan, KP, Pakistan.
  • Byrne. (2005, September 11-15). Making the Right to Health a Reality: Legal Strategies for Effective Implementation [Paper Presentation]. London: Commonwealth Law Conference.
  • Jheelan, Naveesh (2007). The Enforceability of Socio-Economic Rights. European Human Rights Law Review.
  • Salmond, John. (1913). Jurisprudence. London: Stevens and Haynes.
  • Steiner, Alston & Goodman. (2008). International Human Rights Law in Context. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Sunstein, C.R. (1993). Against Positive Rights. 35 East European Constitutional Review.
  • AIR 1986 Supreme Court 49.
  • AIR 1986 Supreme Court 18.
  • AIR 1996 SC 2426.
  • PLD 1994 SC 102.
  • PLD 1994 SC 693.
  • 2001 (4) SA 46 CC.
  • 1997 (12) BCLR 1696.
  • Constitutional Petition No. 45 of 2003.
  • International Legal Instruments
  • International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 1966.
  • International Covenant on Social, Economic and Cultural Rights, 1966.
  • Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948.
  • Constitutions
  • Constitution of India, 1949.
  • Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996.

Cite this article

    CHICAGO : Farid, Naghma, Muhammad Siraj Khan, and Kashif Saleem. 2017. "An Analysis of the Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights." Global Economics Review, II (I): 132-141 doi: 10.31703/ger.2017(II-I).13
    HARVARD : FARID, N., KHAN, M. S. & SALEEM, K. 2017. An Analysis of the Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights. Global Economics Review, II, 132-141.
    MHRA : Farid, Naghma, Muhammad Siraj Khan, and Kashif Saleem. 2017. "An Analysis of the Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights." Global Economics Review, II: 132-141
    MLA : Farid, Naghma, Muhammad Siraj Khan, and Kashif Saleem. "An Analysis of the Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights." Global Economics Review, II.I (2017): 132-141 Print.
    OXFORD : Farid, Naghma, Khan, Muhammad Siraj, and Saleem, Kashif (2017), "An Analysis of the Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights", Global Economics Review, II (I), 132-141
    TURABIAN : Farid, Naghma, Muhammad Siraj Khan, and Kashif Saleem. "An Analysis of the Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights." Global Economics Review II, no. I (2017): 132-141. https://doi.org/10.31703/ger.2017(II-I).13