ARTICLE

BUSINESS MONOPOLY CROSSOWNERSHIP AND QUEST FOR MEDIA MANAGEMENT IN PAKISTAN

15 Pages : 167-175

http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/ger.2023(VIII-I).15      10.31703/ger.2023(VIII-I).15      Published : Mar 2023

Business Monopoly, Cross-Ownership and Quest for Media Management in Pakistan

    The current study critically analyzed the existing state of consolidated media in Pakistan, its business models and its role in society. Consistent with the scholarly work, the study discussed that the five most influential media companies in Pakistan are less democratic, more professionalized and institutionalized which obstruct the free flow of ideas in the marketplace by ignoring alternative perspectives. The Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) was mandated to ensure an equitable, pluralistic and diversified media system but it failed to deliver in the face of the corporate media sector. The present research also called for a more localized and less institutionalized media system in Pakistan to accommodate the concerns of all ethnicities and communities which will help in bringing more social cohesion and integration as compared to the existing media system which is alienating periphery and promoting bland consumerism.

    Business Monopoly, Cross-Ownership, Media Management, PEMRA
    (1) Syed Inam ur Rahman
    Assistant Professor/Incharge, Department of Media and Communication Studies (DMCS), International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
    (2) Muhammad Asghar
    PhD Scholar, Faculty of Management Sciences, Department of Business Administration, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
    (3) Nauman Sial
    Research Associate, Department of Media and Communication Studies (DMCS), International Islamic University Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Albæk, E., Van Dalen, A., Jebril, N., & De Vreese, C. H. (2014). Political Journalism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139567367
  • Spencer, J. W., & Altheide, D. L. (2003). Creating fear: news and the construction of crisis. Contemporary Sociology, 32(4), 463. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556563
  • Barnett, S. (2002). Will a Crisis in Journalism Provoke a Crisis in Democracy? The Political Quarterly, 73(4), 400–408. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923x.00494
  • Bennett, W. L. (1990). Toward a theory of Press-State relations in the United States. Journal of Communication, 40(2), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02265.x
  • Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The Logic of Connective Action: Digital Media and the Personalization of Contentious Politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9970.003.0006
  • Blumler, J. G., & Spicer, C. M. (1990). Prospects for Creativity in the New Television Marketplace: Evidence from Program-Makers. Journal of Communication, 40(4), 78–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02283.x
  • Dalager, J. K. (1998). Spiral of Cynicism: The Press and the Public Good. Joseph B. Cappella , Kathleen Hall JamiesonFree Speech and False Profits: Ethics in the Media. Ted Schwarz. The Journal of Politics, 60(2), 526–528. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647923
  • Ericson, R. V., Baranek, P. M., & Chan, J. (1989). Negotiating Control: A study of news sources. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 14(4), 559. https://doi.org/10.2307/3340672
  • Fallows, J. M. (1996). BREAKING THE NEWS: How the media undermine American democracy. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA30430997
  • Glassner, B. (1999). The culture of fear: why Americans are afraid of the wrong things. Choice Reviews Online, 37(02), 37–1241. h ttps://doi.org/10.5860/choice.37-1241
  • Gurevitch, M., & Blumler, J. G. (1990). Political communication systems and democratic values. In Cambridge University Press eBooks (pp. 269–289). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139172271.011
  • Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems : Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge University Press
  • Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Pantheon Books.
  • Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (2010). Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. New York: Random House.
  • Herman, E. S., & McChesney, R. W. (1997). The Global Media: The New Missionaries of Corporate Capitalism. London: Cassell.
  • Hussain, S. (2015a). Conflict Journalism in Pakistan: A Quest for Constructive Reporting. Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 23(2), 83-101
  • Hussain, S. (2015b). Critical Academic Junctures between Political Communication and Peace Journalism in Pakistan. Global Media Journal: Mediterranean Edition, 10(2), 22-35
  • Hussain, S. (2017). Analyzing the war–media nexus in the conflict-ridden, semi- democratic milieu of Pakistan. Media, War & Conflict, 10(3), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750635216682179
  • Hussain, S., & Lynch, J. (2018). Identifying peace-oriented media strategies for deadly conflicts in Pakistan. Information Development, 35(5), 703–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666918784122
  • Hussain, S., & Rehman, H. U. (2015). Balochistan: Reaping the Benefits of Peace Journalism. Conflict & Communication, 14(2), 1-12 https://regener-online.de/journalcco/2015_2/pdf/hussain-rehman2015.pdf
  • International Media Support. (2012). Special Focus: Safety of Journalists. Copenhagen: International Media Support.
  • Iqbal, M. Z. (2015). The Media–Terrorism Symbiosis: A Case Study of Mumbai Attacks, 2008. Asian Journal of Communication, 25(2), 197-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2014.944924
  • Iqbal, M. Z., & Hussain, S. (2018). Indo-Pak Wars (1948, 1965, 1971, 1999): Projecting the Nationalistic Narrative. Journal of Political Studies, 25(1), 139-156. http://pu.edu.pk/images/journal/pols/pdf-files/9_25_1_18.pdf
  • Kellner, D. (2004). The Media and Social Problems. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Handbook of Social Problems: A Comparative International Perspective (pp. 209-226). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. https://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/essays/medsocialproblems.pdf
  • Khan, Z., & Joseph, B. (2008). Pakistan After Musharraf: The Media Take Center Stage. Journal of Democracy, 19(4), 32-37. https://www.journalofdemocracy.org/articles/pakistan-after-musharraf-the-media-take-center-stage/
  • Lynch, J. (2013). A Global Standard for Reporting Conflict. New York: Routledge.
  • McChesney, R. W. (1999). Rich Media, Poor Democracy: Communication Politics in Dubious Times. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  • McChesney, R. W. (2008). The Political Economy of Media: Enduring Issues, Emerging Dilemmas. New York: Monthly Review Press. https://monthlyreview.org/product/political_economy_of_media/
  • Macquail, D. (1992). Media performance : mass communication and the public interest. Sage Publ. 30(04), 30–1900. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.30-1900
  • McQuail, D. (2000). McQuail’s mass communication theory. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA72240207
  • Rasul, A. (2004). Role of Radio in Development: The Case of Pakistan. Journal of Mass Communication, 11(2), 54-67
  • Rasul, A., & McDowell, S. D. (2012). Consolidation in the Name of Regulation: The Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) and the Concentration of Media Ownership in Pakistan. Global Media Journal, 12(20), 1- 15.
  • Rasul, A., & Proffitt, J. M. (2013). Diversity or Homogeny: Concentration of Ownership and Media Diversity in Pakistan. Asian Journal of Communication, 23(6), 590- 604
  • Rawan, B., & Hussain, S. (2017). Reporting Ethnic Conflict in Karachi: Analysis through the Perspective of War and Peace Journalism. Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 25(2), 61-86.
  • Sabato, L. J. (1991). Feeding Frenzy: How Attack Journalism has Transformed American Politics. New York: Free Press
  • Siraj, S. A., & Hussain, S. (2017). Critical Analysis of Journalistic Autonomy in Pakistan. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 11(1), 106-114
  • Tehranian, M. (2002). Peace Journalism: Negotiating Global Media Ethics. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 7(2), 58-83.
  • Thussu, D. K. (2006). International Communication: Continuity and Change (2nd ed.). London: Hodder Arnold.
  • Thussu, D. K. (2007). The 'Murdochization' of News? The Case of Star TV in India. Media, Culture & Society, 29(4), 593-611.
  • day Newspaper. (2014, September 10). Today Newspaper. Retrieved June 22, 2019, from Today Newspaper: http://www.todaygh.com/real-role-mass-media-modern-democracy/?cv=1
  • Youngblood, S. (2016). Peace Journalism Principles and Practices: Responsibly Reporting Conflicts, Reconciliation, and Solutions. New York: Routledge.

Cite this article

    APA : Rahman, S. I. u., Asghar, M., & Sial, N. (2023). Business Monopoly, Cross-Ownership and Quest for Media Management in Pakistan. Global Economics Review, VIII(I), 167-175. https://doi.org/10.31703/ger.2023(VIII-I).15
    CHICAGO : Rahman, Syed Inam ur, Muhammad Asghar, and Nauman Sial. 2023. "Business Monopoly, Cross-Ownership and Quest for Media Management in Pakistan." Global Economics Review, VIII (I): 167-175 doi: 10.31703/ger.2023(VIII-I).15
    HARVARD : RAHMAN, S. I. U., ASGHAR, M. & SIAL, N. 2023. Business Monopoly, Cross-Ownership and Quest for Media Management in Pakistan. Global Economics Review, VIII, 167-175.
    MHRA : Rahman, Syed Inam ur, Muhammad Asghar, and Nauman Sial. 2023. "Business Monopoly, Cross-Ownership and Quest for Media Management in Pakistan." Global Economics Review, VIII: 167-175
    MLA : Rahman, Syed Inam ur, Muhammad Asghar, and Nauman Sial. "Business Monopoly, Cross-Ownership and Quest for Media Management in Pakistan." Global Economics Review, VIII.I (2023): 167-175 Print.
    OXFORD : Rahman, Syed Inam ur, Asghar, Muhammad, and Sial, Nauman (2023), "Business Monopoly, Cross-Ownership and Quest for Media Management in Pakistan", Global Economics Review, VIII (I), 167-175
    TURABIAN : Rahman, Syed Inam ur, Muhammad Asghar, and Nauman Sial. "Business Monopoly, Cross-Ownership and Quest for Media Management in Pakistan." Global Economics Review VIII, no. I (2023): 167-175. https://doi.org/10.31703/ger.2023(VIII-I).15