http://dx.doi.org/10.31703/ger.2016(I-I).06
10.31703/ger.2016(I-I).06
Published : Dec 2016
US' Strategic Reorientation and Chinese Counter-Narrative: The Economic Reality of Asia-Pacific
The Concept of Asia-Pacific empowers the US to involve in all matters broadly related to Asia-Pacific. In a simple form, the Asia-Pacific region is encompassing West Coast of North America, Australia and major parts of Asia, having the potential to come up as a geopolitical driving force. Asia-Pacific, comprising 22 percent of world land, is one of the most significant regions that possess three well-known Economic Powers, i.e. the US, Japan, and China. Similarly, the region is to be found strategically at an intersection of Middle East, North America, East Asia, and Europe with worlds six largest ports and five highly important Sea Lanes of Communication for international trading. Having so much importance, Goldman Sachs confirms that hub of the global economic activities will be transferred to Asia-Pacific decisively by 2050. The study will analyze the very importance of Asia-Pacific, the US strategic reorientation and the Chinese counternarrative for the region.
-
Asia-Pacific, Pakistan, US, India, CPEC, Southeast Asia
-
(1) Hikmat Shah Afridi
International Islamic University Islamabad, Pakistan.
(2) Manzoor Khan Afridi
Associate Professor, International Islamic University Islamabad, Pakistan.
(3) Muhammad Bilal
Assistant Registrar, Women University, Swabi, KP, Pakistan.
- Ali, S.M. (2008). US-China Relations in the 'Asia-Pacific. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Brzezinski, Z. (1997). The Grand Chessboard. New York: Basic Book.
- Bukhari, S. S. H. (2011). India-US Strategic Partnership: Implications for Pakistan. Berkeley Journal of Social Sciences 1, no. 1, 15-25.
- Butler, P. (2014). Afghan War Box Score: Has America Won or Lost? Russia Today, (accessed January 18, 2015). http://rt.com/op-edge/194928-usa-obama-war-violence-afghanistan/
- Cohen, W. (2007). China's Rise in Historical Perspective. Journal of Strategic Studies. Volume 30, Issue 4-5, 683-704.
- Connors, K. M., Davison, R., & Dosch, J. (2012). The New Global Politics of the Asia Pacific. New York: Routledge.
- Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative & Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
- Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (1990). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
- Goto, S. (Ed.). (2013). Taiwan and the US Pivot to Asia: New Realities in the Region? Washington, D.C.: Wilson Centre.
- Guba, E. G. (1961). Elements of a Proposal. Paper presented at the UCEA meeting. Chapel Hill, NC.
- Harding, H. (1992). A Fragile Relationship, the Unites States and China since 1972. Washington D.C.: The Brooking Institution.
- Huang, V. (2008). Building Maritime Security in Southeast Asia: Outsiders Not Welcome?
- Islam, l. & Chowdhury, A. (1997). Asia Pacific Economies: A Survey. New York: Routledge.
- Jervis, R. (1978). Cooperation under the Security Dilemma. World Politics 30, no. 2.
- Kang, D. (2007). China Rising: Peace, Power and Order in East Asia. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Kang, H. (2009). Maritime Issues in South China Sea: A Survey of Literature. New Delhi: Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
- Kerlinger, F. N. (1979). Behavioural Research: A Conceptual Approach. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
- Khan, T. (2015). Afghan Taliban Confirm Visit to China. Tribune, (accessed January 30, 2015). http://tribune.com.pk/story/828763/afghan
- Ross, S. R. (2012). The Problem with the Pivot. Foreign Affairs, Vol. 91, No. 6, 70-82.
- Shambaugh, D. (2013). China Goes Global: The Partial Power. UK: Oxford University Press.
- Siddiqui, J. (2013). China Ready to Arbitrate in Kashmir Dispute. The Nation, May 19, 2013, (accessed January 18, 2015). http://nation.com.pk/national/19-May-2013/china-ready-to-arbitrate-inkashmir-dispute
- Wesley, M. (2012). Asia's New Age of Instability. The National Interest, Issue 122, 21- 29.
Cite this article
-
APA : Afridi, H. S., Afridi, M. K., & Bilal, M. (2016). US' Strategic Reorientation and Chinese Counter-Narrative: The Economic Reality of Asia-Pacific. Global Economics Review, I(I), 56-65. https://doi.org/10.31703/ger.2016(I-I).06
-
CHICAGO : Afridi, Hikmat Shah, Manzoor Khan Afridi, and Muhammad Bilal. 2016. "US' Strategic Reorientation and Chinese Counter-Narrative: The Economic Reality of Asia-Pacific." Global Economics Review, I (I): 56-65 doi: 10.31703/ger.2016(I-I).06
-
HARVARD : AFRIDI, H. S., AFRIDI, M. K. & BILAL, M. 2016. US' Strategic Reorientation and Chinese Counter-Narrative: The Economic Reality of Asia-Pacific. Global Economics Review, I, 56-65.
-
MHRA : Afridi, Hikmat Shah, Manzoor Khan Afridi, and Muhammad Bilal. 2016. "US' Strategic Reorientation and Chinese Counter-Narrative: The Economic Reality of Asia-Pacific." Global Economics Review, I: 56-65
-
MLA : Afridi, Hikmat Shah, Manzoor Khan Afridi, and Muhammad Bilal. "US' Strategic Reorientation and Chinese Counter-Narrative: The Economic Reality of Asia-Pacific." Global Economics Review, I.I (2016): 56-65 Print.
-
OXFORD : Afridi, Hikmat Shah, Afridi, Manzoor Khan, and Bilal, Muhammad (2016), "US' Strategic Reorientation and Chinese Counter-Narrative: The Economic Reality of Asia-Pacific", Global Economics Review, I (I), 56-65
-
TURABIAN : Afridi, Hikmat Shah, Manzoor Khan Afridi, and Muhammad Bilal. "US' Strategic Reorientation and Chinese Counter-Narrative: The Economic Reality of Asia-Pacific." Global Economics Review I, no. I (2016): 56-65. https://doi.org/10.31703/ger.2016(I-I).06