An Anthropological Study of Religious Economies at the Shrine of Shah Rukn-e- Alam, Multan
Shrine is a place that has religious, cultural, and political significance, especially in Pakistani society. People visit shrines regularly and perform various religious rituals for the pilgrimage of Sufi saints and fulfillment of their needs. This paper analyses the economic underpinnings of various rituals practiced at the shrine of Shah Rukn-e-Alam, Multan. The interplay of religion and economy at shrines is a relatively under-discussed field of study. Drawing on my ethnographic fieldwork at the shrine of Shah Ruk-e-Alam, this study explores various ritualistic practices involving the exchange system, distribution, and reciprocity. For this research, I have focused on three groups of people who are involved in varied forms of exchange like reciprocity, redistribution, and market economy.This study concludes that there are multi-layered meanings of different religious economies performed at the Shrine of ShahRukn-e-Alam, which highlight the religification of commodities and commodification of religion at varied levels.
-
Religious Economies, Shah Rukn-e-Alam, Shrine, Commodification of Religion
-
(1) Tayyaba Batool Tahir
Assistant Professor of Anthropology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Punjab, Pakistan.
- Abbas, Q. & Allah, A. M. (2015). Peoples' Perception about the Effect of Sacred Things Placed at Sufi Shrines in Lahore. EPRA International Journal of Economic and Business Review 3,
- Abbas, S, et al. (2013).
- Abbas, S. B. (2010). The Female Voice in Sufi Ritual. Texas: University of Texas Press.
- Anjum, T. (2015). Androgyny as a Metaphorical Practice in South Asian Sufi Culture. Journal of Asian Civilizations , 38 (1).
- Azam, M. (2010). Religious behaviors in Pakistan: impact on social development. Pakistan Institute for Peace.
- Bankston, C. L. (2003). Rationality, Choice, and the Religious Economy: Individual and Collective Rationality in Supply and Demand. Review of Religious Research, 45(2), 155-171. https://doi.org/10.2307/3512580.
- Bashir, S. (2011). Sufi Bodies. Columbia: Columbia University Press.
- Batool, A., Chaudhry, D. A., Shar, H. B., Nasir, A., & Farooq, H. (2015). Mannat and Associated Beliefs System of People Visiting Shrines. The Explorer: Journal of Social Sciences, 1(2), 37-41.
- Brewster, D. P. (2011). The study of Sufism; towards a methodology. Religion, 6(1), 31-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048- 721x(76)90047-6
- Chaudhary, M. A. (2010). Religious Practices at Sufi Shrines. Pakistan Journal of History and Culture, Vol.XXXI(1), 2-10.
- Ensminger, J. (1994). The Political Economy of Religion: An Economic Anthropologist's Perspective. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) , 150 (4), 745-754.
- Ewing, K. (1983). The Politics of Sufism: Redefining the Saints of Pakistan. JOURNAL OF ASIAN STUDIES, XLII (2), 251-268.
- Farooq, A., & Kayani, A. K. (2012). Prevalence of Superstitions and other Supernatural in Rural Punjab: A Sociological Perspective. A Research Journal of South Asian Studies, 27(2), 335-344.
- Frembgen, J. W. (2012). DhamÄÂl and the performing body: trance dance in the devotional Sufi practice of Pakistan. Journal of Sufi Studies, 1(1), 77-113.
- Hassan, R. (1987). Religion, Society, and the State in Pakistan: Pirs and Politics. Asian Survey, 27(5), 552-565. University of California Press.
- Hassanali, M. (2010). Sufi Influence on Pakistani Politics and Culture. Pakistaniaat: A Journal of Pakistan Studies, 2(1), 23.
- Iannaccone, L. R. (1997). Toward an Economic Theory of http://www.jstor.org/stable/40752990
- Lukens-Bull, R. (2008). Commodification of religion and the 'religification' of commodities: youth culture and religious identity. Religious commodifications in Asia, 220-234.
- Malik, A. & Mirza, R.A. (2015). Religion, Land and Politics: Shrines and Literacy in Punjab. University of Oxford.
- Metcalf, B. D. (2002). Traditionalist' Islamic Activism: Deoband, tablighis, and Talibs. ISIM paper, 1-24.
- Platteau, J.-P. (2011). Political Instrumentalization of Islam and the Risk of Obscurantist Deadlock. World Development, 39(2), 243-250.
- Sabra, A. (2013). Sufi Bodies: Religion and Society in Medieval Islam by Shahzad Bashir (review). Journal of World History, 24(2), 424-425
- Stark, R., & Finke, R. (2000). Acts of Faith: Explaining the Human Side of Religion. University of California Press
- Sultana, K., & Ahmad, R. (2015). Shah Rukne Alam (1251-1335 AD)-A Great Sufi Saint of South Asia. Journal of Asian Civilizations, 38(2), 83.
- Werbner, P. (2002). Langar: Pilgrimage, sacred exchange and perpetual sacrifice in a Sufi saint's lodge. In P. Werbner, & H. Basu, EMBODYING CHARISMA: Modernity, locality and the performance of emotion in Sufi cults. Routledge in Taylor & Francis e-Library.
Cite this article
-
APA : Tahir, T. B. (2021). An Anthropological Study of Religious Economies at the Shrine of Shah Rukn-e- Alam, Multan. Global Economics Review, VI(II), 202 - 211. https://doi.org/10.31703/ger.2021(VI-II).16
-
CHICAGO : Tahir, Tayyaba Batool. 2021. "An Anthropological Study of Religious Economies at the Shrine of Shah Rukn-e- Alam, Multan." Global Economics Review, VI (II): 202 - 211 doi: 10.31703/ger.2021(VI-II).16
-
HARVARD : TAHIR, T. B. 2021. An Anthropological Study of Religious Economies at the Shrine of Shah Rukn-e- Alam, Multan. Global Economics Review, VI, 202 - 211.
-
MHRA : Tahir, Tayyaba Batool. 2021. "An Anthropological Study of Religious Economies at the Shrine of Shah Rukn-e- Alam, Multan." Global Economics Review, VI: 202 - 211
-
MLA : Tahir, Tayyaba Batool. "An Anthropological Study of Religious Economies at the Shrine of Shah Rukn-e- Alam, Multan." Global Economics Review, VI.II (2021): 202 - 211 Print.
-
OXFORD : Tahir, Tayyaba Batool (2021), "An Anthropological Study of Religious Economies at the Shrine of Shah Rukn-e- Alam, Multan", Global Economics Review, VI (II), 202 - 211
-
TURABIAN : Tahir, Tayyaba Batool. "An Anthropological Study of Religious Economies at the Shrine of Shah Rukn-e- Alam, Multan." Global Economics Review VI, no. II (2021): 202 - 211. https://doi.org/10.31703/ger.2021(VI-II).16